Patient record
One record across every department, not one per doctor
A polyclinic is not several clinics in one building — or it should not be. The thing that makes it worth more than its departments is the shared patient, and that only works if there is one record rather than one per department.
A patient seen by dermatology on Tuesday and internal medicine on Thursday is one patient. Their history, allergies, medication and balance are the same in both rooms, and neither department has to ask again.

The internal referral is where a polyclinic earns its margin, and it is usually the thing nobody tracks. A referral carries the clinical reason, lands in the other department’s list, and is measurable as revenue afterwards.
Departments have different costs, different utilisation and different margins. A single clinic-wide revenue figure hides which one is carrying the others.

The shared patient is the only thing that makes a polyclinic worth more than its departments, and it only exists if the record is shared.
One record across every department, not one per doctor
Margin per department, so you know which ones pay
Rooms and devices booked across departments without clashes
Permissions and commission per department
Yes — services, prices, consumption, commission rules and recall intervals are all set per department, while the patient record stays shared.
Yes. The usual setup gives a doctor their own department’s patients and their own production figures, with the owner seeing across all of them.
Yes, with the clinical reason attached, landing in the receiving department’s list and reportable afterwards as revenue by source department.
Half an hour on your own services, packages and price list. Someone calls you back within a day.